This Article Résumé Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moeschler, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication?

Department of Linguistics, University of Geneva, jacques.moeschler{at}unige.ch

This article is about pragmatics and emotion. The main purpose of pragmatics is to account for utterance-interpretation processes in verbal communication. In recent years much of pragmatics research has been devoted to the understanding of propositional effects; that is, to cognitive effects on mental representations with propositional forms such as implicatures and explicatures. Little energy has been devoted to non-propositional effects; that is, to pragmatic effects that have no propositional formats and are mainly associated with emotional reactions such as fear, pleasure, joy, anguish, etc. Utterances are, however, often the causes of such non-propositional effects. This paper presents a general framework, Relevance Theory, which could account for non-propositional effects. The limits of these theoretical approaches are also exposed.

Key Words: Emotion • Implicatures • Pragmatics • Propositional and non-propositional effects • Relevance

Social Science Information, Vol. 48, No. 3, 447-464 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0539018409106200


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?