Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Information
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What are emotions? And how can they be measured?

Klaus R. Scherer

Klaus.Scherer{at}pse.unige.ch

Defining "emotion" is a notorious problem. Without consensual conceptualization and operationalization of exactly what phenomenon is to be studied, progress in theory and research is difficult to achieve and fruitless debates are likely to proliferate. A particularly unfortunate example is William James’s asking the question "What is an emotion?" when he really meant "feeling", a misnomer that started a debate which is still ongoing, more than a century later. This contribution attempts to sensitize researchers in the social and behavioral sciences to the importance of definitional issues and their consequences for distinguishing related but fundamentally different affective processes, states, and traits. Links between scientific and folk concepts of emotion are explored and ways to measure emotion and its components are discussed.

Key Words: Affective processes • Emotion • Feeling • Folk concepts of emotion • Measurement of emotion • Scientific concepts of emotion

Social Science Information, Vol. 44, No. 4, 695-729 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0539018405058216


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
R. Cowie
Perceiving emotion: towards a realistic understanding of the task
Phil Trans R Soc B, December 12, 2009; 364(1535): 3515 - 3525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Anders, F. Eippert, S. Wiens, N. Birbaumer, M. Lotze, and D. Wildgruber
When seeing outweighs feeling: a role for prefrontal cortex in passive control of negative affect in blindsight
Brain, November 1, 2009; 132(11): 3021 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emotion ReviewHome page
R. Reisenzein and S. A. Doring
Ten Perspectives on Emotional Experience: Introduction to the Special Issue
Emotion Review, July 1, 2009; 1(3): 195 - 205.
[PDF]


Home page
Emotion ReviewHome page
N. H. Frijda
Emotion Experience and its Varieties
Emotion Review, July 1, 2009; 1(3): 264 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Sokol-Hessner, M. Hsu, N. G. Curley, M. R. Delgado, C. F. Camerer, and E. A. Phelps
Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5035 - 5040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]