Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Information
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koch, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kruse, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Women and leadership – 20 years later: a semantic connotation study

Sabine C. Koch

Department of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47–51, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. sabine.koch{at}urz.uni-heidelberg.de

Rebecca Luft

psychology programme at the Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg; University of Heidelberg (Department of Psychology)

Lenelis Kruse

Fernuniversität Hagen and at the University of Heidelberg

English

We investigated the semantic connotations of the concepts woman, man, leadership, manager and businesswoman (N = 101) on 25-item semantic differentials. Our study was a replication of Kruse and Wintermantel (1986), who had found that the concepts man, leadership and manager formed one cluster, whereas businesswoman and woman each remained separate (woman being particularly far off the main cluster). The authors concluded that leadership was still male. We were now interested in the changes in semantic connotations of those concepts over the last 20 years. In addition to influence of participants' sex, we were also interested in how professionals differed from students in their representations of these concepts. Results suggest that (a) clusters have changed, with manager, leadership and businesswoman now forming the main cluster, and (b) influence of professional status was more pronounced than influence of participants' sex. The observed changes in concepts lead us to the carefully optimistic statement that societal gender roles seem to be changing in the direction of more representational and also more factual gender equality.

French

Sur un différentiel sémantique de 25 termes les auteurs ont étudié les connotations sémantiques des concepts femme, homme, leadership, manager et femme d'affaires (N = 101). Cette étude est une réplication de celle de Kruse et Wintermantel (1986), qui avait montré que les concepts homme, leadership et manager constituaient un seul groupe, alors que ceux de femme d'affaire et femme restaient isolés (femme se situant particulièrement à l'écart du groupe principal). Kruse et Wintermantel en avaient conclu que leadership restait un concept masculin. Dans cette étude, les auteurs s'intéressent aux changements des connotations sémantiques survenus pendant les 20 dernières années. Au delà de l'influence du facteur 'sexe du participant', ils s'intéressent également aux différentes représentations de ces concepts pour des personnes en activité et des étudiants. Les résultats obtenus suggèrent que (a) les groupes ont changé, le groupe principal comprenant maintenant manager, leadership et femme d'affaire et (b) l'influence du facteur 'statut professionnel' est plus forte que celle du facteur 'sexe des participants'. Les changements observés au niveau des concepts conduisent les auteurs à affirmer, avec un optimisme prudent, que les rôles par genre dans la société actuelle semblent changer et que la tendance est à une égalité de genre au niveau des représentations et donc aussi au niveau des faits.

Key Words: Gender • Language • Leadership • Semantic differential • Stereotypes • Women

Social Science Information, Vol. 44, No. 1, 9-39 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0539018405050433


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?