This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Aikins, A. d.-G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Exploring Biomedical and Ethnomedical Representations of Diabetes in Ghana and the Scope for Cross-professional Collaboration: a Social Psychological Approach to Health Policy

Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. A.De-Graft-Aikins{at}lse.ac.uk

This article examines the ways in which ethnomedical and biomedical representations of chronic illness and approaches to treatment impact on illness action. Using diabetes care in Ghana as a case study, qualitative interviews were conducted with rural and urban biomedical and ethnomedical practitioners to examine professional representations of diabetes, descriptions of the treatment process and assessment of in-group and out-group knowledge base and practices. The social representations concept of cognitive polyphasia is used as an analytical tool to examine consensus and conflict within and between group narratives. Three major findings are outlined. Firstly, there are more areas of consensus than conflict across professional groups, particularly on the broad themes of health, illness and treatment processes. Secondly, the clash between the two groups is fuelled by internal as well as acrossgroup conflict on notions of cure and the spiritual basis of illness. The function of this clash is to underscore professional legitimacy and expertise in a complex area of illness where individuals are in constant eclectic search for answers to cure. Thirdly and critically, there is strong indication that the function of the clash is constantly undermined by illness action, and it is recognition of this that opens up practical ways for cross-professional collaboration. In the concluding sections, some practical recommendations for improving health policy are outlined and discussed.

Key Words: Cognitive polyphasia • Diabetes care • Illness action • Medical pluralism • Social representations

Social Science Information, Vol. 41, No. 4, 625-652 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0539018402041004007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?