Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Information
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujigaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists' everyday activities: applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge

Yuko Fujigaki

This study examines how the micro-conditions of scientists in the accretion of their daily activities - publishing - create a macro-essence that philosophers and scientific historians call "the essence of science". By applying the autopoiesis system theory to the aggregation of publications in scientific journals - the process by which the continuation of micro-activity (a system's operation) creates a macro-construction (the system's structure) - we are able to bridge the gap between discussions about science and scientists' actual activities. This point of view gave us new insight into and an empirical perspective on how the difference between the two cultures (as popularized by C.P. Snow) or the cultural difference between disciplines can be described by the system's operation, and also on how the system's two boundaries (i.e. the boundary between science and non-science and the boundary between science and society) can be constructed in consideration of the validation boundary in the journal system and in society.

Key Words: Autopoiesis • Communication • Journal system • Publication • Science and society • Validation boundary

Social Science Information, Vol. 37, No. 1, 5-22 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/053901898037001001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
L. Leydesdorff
Scientific Communication and Cognitive Codification: Social Systems Theory and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
European Journal of Social Theory, August 1, 2007; 10(3): 375 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science InformationHome page
Y. Fujigaki and L. Leydesdorff
Quality control and validation boundaries in a triple helix of university-industry-government: "Mode 2" and the future of university research
Social Science Information, December 1, 2000; 39(4): 635 - 655.
[Abstract] [PDF]