Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Information
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Michael, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

What do we know about "don't knows"? Or, contexts of "ignorance"

Jill Turner

Mike Michael

This paper addresses the meanings of "ignorance" in the context of "don't know" responses to questionnaires. First, we consider some of the broader functions of questionnaires, suggesting that they reflect and mediate between particular types of institutions, respondents and society. We then unpack some of the meanings of "don't know" responses. Specifically, we argue that the "don't know" response is not merely a sign of deficit but, potentially, a potent political statement. Moreover, in relation to studies of the public understanding of science, it can be employed as a resource by people reflexively to express their identity through their relationship with science. Next we consider ignorance in the more expansive contexts of late modernity, which include concerns about the ambivalent role of science in general, the transgressive quality of biotechnology in particular and the impetus to narrate the self. Consideration of these factors, we argue, may be useful for further interrogation of the meanings of "don't know" responses.

Social Science Information, Vol. 35, No. 1, 15-37 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/053901896035001002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. W. Bauer, N. Allum, and S. Miller
What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 79 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Michael
Between citizen and consumer: multiplying the meanings of the "public understanding of science"
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1998; 7(4): 313 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
M. Bauer
Socio-demographic correlates of DK-responses in knowledge surveys: self-attributed ignorance of science
Social Science Information, March 1, 1996; 35(1): 39 - 68.
[Abstract]